<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (In)Consistency in keyboard shortcuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/03/07/inconsistency-in-keyboard-shortcuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/03/07/inconsistency-in-keyboard-shortcuts/</link>
	<description>Improving the human experience one day at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:23:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Farner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitterrific v. Twhirl v. IM</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/03/07/inconsistency-in-keyboard-shortcuts/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Farner &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitterrific v. Twhirl v. IM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/03/inconsistency-in-keyboard-shortcuts/#comment-567</guid>
		<description>[...] Twhirl gets the win here with a box big enough to see your whole tweet, has twitpic, and a built-in URL shortener.  And I just discovered during this post that the filter box is a nifty little search box.  No contest on this one for me.  I cannot use Twitterrific for updating because I can&#8217;t see my entire post.  And while CMD-D on my Mac is easy enough to remember, the rest of the keyboard shortcuts in Twitterrific are negated because I can&#8217;t remember them (see Whitney&#8217;s post on keyboard shortcuts.)  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #EEEEEE">
<p>[...] Twhirl gets the win here with a box big enough to see your whole tweet, has twitpic, and a built-in URL shortener.  And I just discovered during this post that the filter box is a nifty little search box.  No contest on this one for me.  I cannot use Twitterrific for updating because I can&#8217;t see my entire post.  And while CMD-D on my Mac is easy enough to remember, the rest of the keyboard shortcuts in Twitterrific are negated because I can&#8217;t remember them (see Whitney&#8217;s post on keyboard shortcuts.)  [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Stevens</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/03/07/inconsistency-in-keyboard-shortcuts/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/03/inconsistency-in-keyboard-shortcuts/#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Even the method for initialising shortcuts is still in the air.

It would seem most sensible to use the accessibility standard of access keys to initiate shortcut commands. (shift+letter).

This I believe is the approach that google take and makes most sense from a standards and progressive enhancement point of view. The use of Ctrl+key is likely to iterfere with the browser. 

Developers however need to be careful that the use of the shift key doesn&#039;t interfere with typing, as nothing is more infuriating than trying to type something with a cap only to jump somewhere else in the page or fire some random function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even the method for initialising shortcuts is still in the air.</p>
<p>It would seem most sensible to use the accessibility standard of access keys to initiate shortcut commands. (shift+letter).</p>
<p>This I believe is the approach that google take and makes most sense from a standards and progressive enhancement point of view. The use of Ctrl+key is likely to iterfere with the browser. </p>
<p>Developers however need to be careful that the use of the shift key doesn&#8217;t interfere with typing, as nothing is more infuriating than trying to type something with a cap only to jump somewhere else in the page or fire some random function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Varun Mathur</title>
		<link>http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/03/07/inconsistency-in-keyboard-shortcuts/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Varun Mathur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whitneyhess.com/blog/2008/03/inconsistency-in-keyboard-shortcuts/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Hi Whitney

Interesting post..

When we decided on keyboard shortcuts for Alertle (www.alertle.com), a new web-based RSS feed reader, we focused on &quot;intuitiveness&quot;.

For example, to move up/down between headlines, simply use the up/down arrow. And to scroll up/down while reading an article, use pgup/pgdown. The way the application was designed and its layout helped in that. 

But I think Google Reader can&#039;t have up/down arrow as its keyboard shortcut for moving between the headlines because they use it to scroll on the page! Thus they have &quot;j&quot;, &quot;k&quot; for it..

Check out a comparison between Alertle and Google Reader at this link: http://blog.alertle.com/?p=10

Full list of Alertle&#039;s shortcuts are here: http://wiki.alertle.com/doku.php/hotkeys</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Whitney</p>
<p>Interesting post..</p>
<p>When we decided on keyboard shortcuts for Alertle (www.alertle.com), a new web-based RSS feed reader, we focused on &#8220;intuitiveness&#8221;.</p>
<p>For example, to move up/down between headlines, simply use the up/down arrow. And to scroll up/down while reading an article, use pgup/pgdown. The way the application was designed and its layout helped in that. </p>
<p>But I think Google Reader can&#8217;t have up/down arrow as its keyboard shortcut for moving between the headlines because they use it to scroll on the page! Thus they have &#8220;j&#8221;, &#8220;k&#8221; for it..</p>
<p>Check out a comparison between Alertle and Google Reader at this link: <a href="http://blog.alertle.com/?p=10" rel="nofollow">http://blog.alertle.com/?p=10</a></p>
<p>Full list of Alertle&#8217;s shortcuts are here: <a href="http://wiki.alertle.com/doku.php/hotkeys" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.alertle.com/doku.php/hotkeys</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.870 seconds -->
